Why this page and why I do this?
This my 13th attempt of February 04 for the Deaths at Flag pages accessible trough www.whyaretheydead.net. Please bear with me while I try to put my motives and feelings into words. I am not known to be a great writer and English isn't my first language. It isn't easy to formulate my gut feelings, just the mere notice that Scientology is "bad" won't do if I want to offer you a glimpse into my motives. Try it for yourself. I find it hard, very hard to do if I want to make a well reasoned focused argument, leaving many other immoral concepts of Scientology aside. I don't know where this little exploration will end and how it ultimately will look, so lets just start. |
One death is sad, two deaths is bad, many deaths is terrible
That, in short, is my answer. One of my reasons is to
show a pattern of deceit. To put an end to the lie that Scientology isn't
engaged in the healing field, mentally as well as physically. This despite
their public statements such as that "a Scientologist with a physical
condition is always advised to seek and obtain needed examination and
treatment by a qualified medical professional." [ 1
].
After reading many Scientology "scriptures" I can't judge
differently than that such statements are merely a way to avoid legal
accountability. Scientology's texts are crammed with claims of mental
and physical cures of which I shall cite a few examples below and the
devastating results therof.
The Deaths at Flag page obviously covers a topic that can be emotional It would be shallow of me not to acknowledge that. Fact is that I want the page to have an impact. So much so, that no one in his/her right mind after reading it has a possible desire left to join the Scientology organization ever. If I didn't want the page to have an impact it would have been silly to have spent the time and effort of making it. What I don't want is that the page be used to unfairly attack scientologists. That is something I don't condone. My beef is with the organization and not with the rank and file members who are often just normal people like you and me, although miss-guided by an organization of which they're dependent. Having said that, I must admit that I'm no angel myself. That official attitude is only a camouflage
Kevin Anderson noted in his report [ 2
], published in 1965 for the state of Victoria, Australia
Sir Foster likewise expressed in his report [ 3 ]
of 1971 some difficulty with Scientology's denial
In a lawsuit between Scientolgy of Minnesota v. Department of Health,
Education and Welfare of Minnesota [ 4 ] a few quotes
of Hubbard were used to show the purposes of Scientology:
Scientology isn't sure how it is that people become ill
In his confidential "Assists" lecture which
only very high-up scientologists have heard, Hubbard said: "People
are supposed to be sick. Also a body was only supposed to live 70 years
which is a bunch of balderdash. Before R6 and so forth, they lived on
and on and on and on and on! There was no such thing as this. They taught
people death, they taught them amnesia."
That however, whould contradict with a Scientology book. In the Handbook
for Preclears [ 6 ] it is written: "Nobody ever
became ill without wanting to be ill at some earlier moment in his life."
Maybe you're not sick. Maybe you're just suppressed?
Anderson [ 2 ] once again.
"By healing you can graduate a pc up to clearing interest
and thus we have a lower level feeder line, capable of successful
accomplishment with normal HCA/HPA training. That programme has the
following thought major: Maybe you're not sick. Maybe you're just
suppressed. See us and find out. . . . Legally, this permits us to
heal without engaging in healing as, in actual fact, we address no
illnesses and indeed, deny people are ill - they are only suppressed.
. . . The legal argument is simple, we don't believe in sickness,
we do not address illness, we do not diagnose, we believe that freeing
the human spirit also incidentally prevents sickness. We are doing
prevention. We also find people do not have to be crazy to be suppressed,
that nearly everybody is suppressed. We do send acutely ill people
to doctors. We advertise to cure no diseases! That last is important
legally. We only infer that people who think they are sick are really
not, but only suppressed."
A heart attack was purely psychosomatic
Anderson [ 2 ]: "In various places
Hubbard has written to the effect that arthritis, eye conditions, heart
conditions, cancer, all psychosomatic illnesses, morning sickness, ulcers,
tuberculosis, the common cold, the common cough, illness from bacterial
or virus infections, alcoholism and a multitude of other complaints and
conditions are engramic and respond to processing."
Noah Lottick insisted before his suicide [ 7 ] that
his father's heart attack was purely psychosomatic.
According to Hana Whitfield [ 8 ] who was a scientologist
for twenty years, Hubbard even claimed that "clears" had freedom
of death.
Sadly it didn't work that way for Herbert Pfaff [ 9
] who died august 28, 1988 in the Scientology Fort Harrison Hotel. His
scientologist doctor reports that he prescribed vitamins for Heribert,
dispite regular attacks he suffered after surviving a major car accident.
So strong are scientologists believes in Hubbard's - and now Scientology's
- claims to cure it all, that they don't seek medical assistance soon
enough, according to Hana [ 7 ]
223. In Hubbard's 1975 edition of his book, History of Man, Hubbard
wrote on page 20, "Cancer has been eradicated by auditing out
conception and mitosis." Attached hereto as Exhibit 87.
Perhaps Scientology can explain me why Roxanne Friend [ 10 ] hadn't audited "out conception and mitosis," because she died of cancer and might still me alive today if she had sought competent medical treatment earlier. She did not because she felt that Scientology auditing could cure illnesses. Practicing medicine without a license
Keith Henson [ 11 ] posted under his
own name two Scientology pages of NED for OTs Series 34 [ 12
] in the newsgroup alt.religion.scienology [ 13 ] because
it is his believe (and mine) that they contain instructions how to practice
medicine without a license.
Scientology did sue Keith and he lost in May 1998 (Judge Ronald M. Whyte,
Northern District Court of California) and has to pay $75,000 in statutory
damages. Scientology was awarded $75,000 for attorney's fees in his copyright
infringement case. Mr. Henson has appealed.
A fair-use excerpt of the document he posted:
This is in my opinion a violation of Judge Gesell's ruling [ 14 ]. on 4 January 1963 the Food and Drug Administration raided Scientology in Washington [ 15 ] and seized a huge quantity of E-meters [ 16 ] and books. The FDA charged that the E-Meter -- a crude lie detector used by Scientology auditors (counselors) and essentially a simple galvanometer using two tin cans as electrodes -- was mislabled and forced the Scientologists to label it ineffective in the diagnosis or treatment of disease. However as can be read in the above cite, the E-Meter is still used to treat the sick. The give away in the quote is "cease to read." After eight years of legal proceedings, US Judge Gesell of the District Court of Columbia, commented in a July 30, 1971 Memorandum Opinion [ 14 ]: Hubbard and his fellow Scientologists developed the notion of using an E-meter to aid auditing. Substantial fees were charged for the meter. They repeatedly and explicitly represented that such auditing effectuated cures of many physical and mental illnesses. An individual processed with the aid of the E-meter was said to read the intended goal of "clear" and was led to believe there was reliable scientific proof that once cleared many, indeed most illnesses would automatically be cured. Auditing was guaranteed to be successful. All this was and is false -- in short, a fraud. Contrary to representations made, there is absolutely no scientific or medical basis in fact for the claimed cures attributed to E-meter auditing. [...}"To this day the Church of Scientology has never fully complied with the relabeling order, but E-meters do carry an abbreviated version of it." (quote of the book: A Piece of Blue Sky ) [ 17 ] Perhaps the unwillingness of the scientologists to accept ilnesses, was the reason why air-head Scientology celebrity Jenna Elfman refused to participate in a charity autograph auction. The Dharma & Greg star refused to take part in a celebrity autograph auction for an organization that raised money for the care of children with HIV. As a brainwashed devotee of The Church of Scientology, the bah-humbugy Elfman stated that she couldn't support any organization that raised money for AIDS research or relief because "AIDS is a state of mind, not a disease."
|
|