There seems to be a paragraph missing in this document.
Ptsc posted a similar text of what should probably have been the text of that missing part in spirit:
Minton believes that Judge Schaeffer is not entitled to immunity from
suit for her tortious conduct and may be liable for substantial damages
to Minton. Furthermore, Minton believes that no immunity attaches to the
statutory cause of action provided for in Fla. Stat. 48.20. Because
Minton has potential tort claims against Judge Schaeffer, the latter has
a direct pecuniary interest in seeing Minton discredited, lose valuable
rights, or become incarcerated, and hence, the outcome of the case
before her. As such, a suggestion of disqualification is likewise
appropriate. See, Fla. Stat. 38.02 and Fla. R. Jud. Ad. 2.160(d)(2
Lifted from this document