Scientology Critical Information Directory

This site is best viewed using a highly standards-compliant browser

Author wants Scientology subpoena quashed

Title: Author wants Scientology subpoena quashed
Date: Wednesday, 2 September 1981
Publisher: St. Petersburg Times (Florida)
Author: David E. Anderson
Main source:

Disclaimer: This archive is presented strictly in the public interest for research purposes. All the copyrights of materials reproduced here are the properties of their respective owners.

WASHINGTON — A Reader's Digest senior editor, author of an article critical of the Church of Scientology, asked a federal court Tuesday to quash a church-sought subpoena aimed at compelling his testimony in a lawsuit.

"This Scientology action seeks to harass and vilify journalists who have published criticism of this criminal enterprise," said lawyers for Eugene Methvin, a senior editor at the Digest, and Jane Denis Smith, a former researcher at the magazine, in their petition to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Scientology lawyers seek to compel Methvin's and Ms. Smith's testimony in a three-year old lawsuit they have brought aginst one of their harshest and most persistent critics, freelance writer Paulette Cooper, author of the 1971 book, The Scandal of Scientology.

METHVIN IS THE author of two Reader's Digest articles critical of the controversial Scientology movement. He said he believes the group's effort to subpoena him as a witness for the Cooper trial is directly related to the article currently appearing in the Digest and is aimed at harassing him and the magazine.

Methvin quoted L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the group, as saying members should "be very alert to sue for slander at the slightest chance so as to discourage the public press from mentioning Scientology . . . The purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to win."

The group has already written Reader's Digest, charging the article in the current September issue of the magazine is libelous and demanding a retraction.

"IT IS BEYOND dispute that Scientology uses legal processes to harass and burden those who exercise their constitutional rights to criticize Scientology," said Methvin's lawyers, outlining legal actions the group took following publication of his first article.