Scientology from inside out: A former insider
reveals strategies for managing the news media
They say the first step in any recovery program is
the admission, so here it is: I handled public relations
(PR) and the media for
L. Ron Hubbard and his
Scientology empire for 20 years.
It is no accident that I avoid saying "Church of
Scientology" — the trademarked corporate name. The
Scientology world is much larger than merely the
"Church" of Scientology (see sidebar "Secular", p. 40).
It is a labyrinth of corporate shells that, like a hall
of mirrors, was designed to baffle all but the
initiated. Add to that an arcane language and dedicated
"PRs" trained to divert and control inquiries, and it
becomes obvious why few outsiders have been able to
comprehend the Scientology hydra, let alone write about
it. I hope this will make it easier.
From 1969 to 1989, I worked at every echelon of the
organization, from a small, new "mission" up to national
and then international level, including handling media
in other countries and working at Hubbard's personal
literary agency. During my tenure, I handled reporters
from high school papers and from The New York Times. I
have appeared as a Scientology spokesman on radio talk
shows and national TV news, as well as in magazines,
books, and even a documentary film. I was a member of
the Guardian's Office, the pseudo-naval
Sea
Organization, and the glitzy Author Services Inc.,
Hubbard's literary agency in downtown Hollywood.
When the FBI
raided Church of Scientology Guardian
offices in Los Angeles and D.C. in 1977, I was the
national spokesman, fielding questions on that day and
in the months to come.
When Hubbard's secret international headquarters at
Gilman Hot Springs near Hemet, California, was exposed
in 1980, I went in to convert the image of the facility
overnight. I gave the Los Angeles ABC-TV affiliate a
tour of "Golden Era Productions," the image it still has
to this day (see sidebar "How to fool the press", p.
41).
When Hubbard
died in 1986, I was called to his secret
California ranch, arriving well before the authorities
were called, to help design and implement the strategy
to control the media, as well as to calm his followers.
For my training, I studied and had secret directives
from Hubbard and others on how to handle reporters, how
to deal with police and government agencies, how to
create front groups, and how to discredit or destroy a
person or a group with Hubbard's "fair game" doctrine.
I also trained other Scientology PRs on how to handle
the media, using material from Hubbard. This included
- how to respond to a question without answering,
- how to
divert the issue,
- how to tell "an acceptable truth,"
- how
to stall for time,
- how to assume various emotional
states to control another,
- how to "attack the attacker,"
- how to take control of a conversation,
- how to introvert
a person and how to "get the message across" (especially
in an age of sound bites),
- how to help Scientology
attorneys write inflammatory legal papers so the PR
could then safely use the abusive phrases, and
- how to
appear to be a religion.
This, in brief, is what a journalist faces when
encountering a trained and dedicated Scientology PR. The
journalist wants a story. The PR wants to kill the
story, or at least control it. While this is not
particularly unusual, Scientology goes further than
most. Scientology stands ready and able to unleash an
assault on the journalist that can include private
detectives and lawsuits, making it little wonder that
publications have grown reluctant to write about the
Hubbard empire. (See "Shudder into silence," Quill,
Nov./Dec., 1991.)
Since Scientologists know how the Fourth Estate
operates, it's time the journalist had a chance to learn
some of the attitudes, rules, tactics, and tricks known
only to Scientology.
- Your local fanatic.
Before taking with any
Scientology PR or executive, a journalist must know that
he or she will be talking to a fanatic — a person
seeking to save the world. This is exactly what
Scientologists believe they are doing.
Moreover, unless you stand ready to print a
Scientology story exactly as presented, you will be
viewed as an enemy, an agent of the
American Medical
Association (AMA), a mouthpiece of psychiatry, or
someone ready "to sell out the human race if his editor
told him to" — in the words of a Hubbard policy letter
of August 14, 1963. (This is a key Scientology document.
Ask a PR to give you a copy. If he declines, it can be
found in the green policy volumes available in any
Scientology bookstore.
- You keeping notes?
Know that after your meeting
(and after each encounter, including phone calls) the PR
will write a debrief. This report will usually be e-mailed to the PR's superior and up the command
channel — and probably also into an intelligence area
for filing. Therefore, start your own notes of
everything that transpires.
- Image is everything.
Realize that when you are
dealing with a PR or official of the Church of
Scientology, religious image is not only a vital PR defense (the ecclesiastical equivalent of wrapping
oneself in the flag) but is also crucial for
tax-exemption purposes and for court cases. Thus the PR
must be sure to demonstrate that Scientology is "an
applied religious philosophy." The PR will have many
documents to "prove the religious bona fides" of
Scientology (but lack anything to the contrary — such as
decisions or rulings — of which he may honestly not
know).
- The shell game.
When proving the bona fides, PRs make no distinction
among the many Scientology corporations. A Los
Angeles organization will parade the acceptance of
Scientology in London or St. Louis. But when needed,
a complex labyrinth of corporations — a veritable
hall of mirrors — comes into play. Suddenly no two
Scientology organizations touch. Officials of one
will act as if they barely know the officials in
another. The reason is, of course, the
IRS and the
courts.
So try to find out which corporation you're
talking to and how it relates to the material you
are being given. See if the PR or official is
willing to go on-record permeating the corporate
shells.
Trying to sort out the relations between the
Church of Spiritual Technology,
World Institute of
Scientology Enterprises, and the
Religious
Technology Center is like trying to solve a Rubik's
Cube. Simply take the shortcut: find the
unincorporated Sea Organization (SO). Touted as a
"fraternal" organization, the SO is the highest
inner circle of Scientology; it was the actual alter
ego of Hubbard, the hidden nexus that permeates all
corporations. Surprisingly, it has escaped scrutiny.
But asking the SO about the SO is like asking the
CIA about the CIA. The difference is the CIA must
respond to Freedom of Information Act requests.
- Say what?
Politicians are notorious for responding to a
question without answering it; Scientology PRs
practice the skill for hours on end. The PR will
drill how to answer simple questions about
Scientology, how to "no-answer" a question, how to
stall for time, and how to attack. (According to the
original material, this included shouting, banging
the desk, pointing at the reporter, and swearing.)
Thus a seemingly innocuous question such as "What
is Scientology?" has already been practiced
extensively, and there is a ready answer. More
probing questions will produce "no answer."
Therefore a reporter can measure sensitivity by
avoidance, and you will find that once you
understand this, it is quite easy to spot.
To deal with this, first realize that it is part of
the PR's training. Listen carefully to his or her
answers. (Better yet, tape the interview.) When the PR
tries to avoid the question with a non sequitur, repeat
your question. Continue to repeat your question until
you actually get an answer. Ask the PR what drills he or
she did before your interview, and ask to see current
organization policies on handling the media. (Many are
publicly available in Scientology bookstores.)
- A dead what?
Depending on your story angle, you can easily find
yourself buried by packs of documentation. Some are
called "DA [dead agent] packs." Hubbard took the
phrase from
Sun-tzu's "The Art of War," in which
different types of agents are described. The "dead
agent" is the one who is caught in a lie. The "DA
pack" is supposed to counter a lie (thereby
rendering the liar "dead" as a credible source) and
usually addresses a particular document, from a
newspaper article to a book. It is also used to
discredit a person or a group that may be a source
of criticism of Scientology.
A DA pack can include anything from Hubbard's
writings to a piece of press to an affidavit
obtained by a private investigator. The purpose is
to refute the targeted piece, person or group at
virtually any cost. If the article presents no
clear-cut falsehoods or errors but paints
Scientology in an unfavorable light, the DA becomes
a general reply (usually an attack on the source)
that may be issued as a pamphlet, an ad, or an
article.
Where possible, verify the claims or documentation.
Contact the targeted person, group, or author of the
article. Also take note of what is not refuted or
challenged. In Scientology, omission can be as good as
admission.
You can ask to talk to the people who produced the DA
pack, but chances are you will not be allowed to,
because they are not trained to deal with the media. In
Scientology, only trained PRs are supposed to talk to
the press. If an exception is made, it will be only
those that are proofed up or drilled or have a proven
track record of talking to the media about Scientology,
and then it is often with a PR present. (A recent
example will be found in the September issue of
Premiere. The reporter was denied access to Hollywood
celebrities in Scientology.) If you can do it, find some
staff members who will talk to you. Find some field
Scientologists to interview. You'll learn more from
them.
- Go for the gold.
In Scientology, there
is an exact chain of command. Each organization has
one. The public version is supposed to be posted on
a large wall of the organization. It should show the
local position of your PR What will not be shown is
his or her chain of command.
The media are handled by the
Office of Special
Affairs, or OSA, in the Church of Scientology. The
OSA PR will have a senior on the PR chain of
command. If the PR is a local OSA staff member
(meaning the PR for a city or area), his or her
senior will be at the continental level (such as OSA
United States, located in Los Angeles) and then at
the "int" or international level (OSA Int is also in
L.A.). After that, the chain of command jumps to the
Religious Technology Center (RTC). In highly unusual
circumstances, an RTC official will intervene to
handle a journalist, particularly if it is a crucial
story for one reason or another, because RTC
monitors all OSA activity and is ultimately
responsible for any media on Scientology, whether
good or bad.
RTC's chairman of the board is David Miscavige, who
is now the admitted head of the Church of Scientology.
His latest intervention will be found in the October
issue of Premiere magazine. For any story on
Scientology, Miscavige is the one to be interviewed. He
lives on the Golden Era Productions property at Gilman
Hot Springs. The PR assigned to you will know how to get
a message to him. If all else fails, call Golden Era
Productions. The personnel there know how to reach him.
Conclusion.
Scientology is in a state of siege with psychiatry,
the media, and anything else perceived as attacking
Hubbard or the organization. It has been that way since
Hubbard named them as enemies decades ago. Talk to a
Scientology PR long enough, and you may begin to sense
something vaguely familiar about the attitude. walk
through a Scientology office, and the proliferation of
photographs and busts of Hubbard may strike a familiar
chord.
Just substitute "Sea Organization" for "Party" in the
following passage, and the chilling parallel may be
evident:
"Even the humblest Party member is expected
to be competent, industrious, and even
intelligent within narrow limits, but it is also
necessary that he should be a credulous and
ignorant fanatic whose prevailing moods are
fear, hatred, adulation, and orgiastic triumph.
In other words it is necessary that he should
have the mentality appropriate to a state of
war. It does not matter whether the war is
actually happening, and, since no decisive
victory is possible, it does not matter whether
the war is going well or badly. All that is
needed is that a state of war should exist. The
splitting of the intelligence which the Party
requires of its members, and which is more
easily achieved in an atmosphere of war, is now
almost universal, but the higher up the ranks
one goes, the more marked it becomes. It is
precisely in the Inner Party that war hysteria
and hatred of the enemy are strongest. In his
capacity as an administrator, it is often
necessary for a member of the Inner Party to
know that this or that item of war news is
untruthful, and he may often be aware that the
entire war is spurious and is either not
happening or is being waged for purpose quite
other than the declared ones; but such knowledge
is easily neutralized by the technique of
double-think meanwhile no Inner Party member
wavers for an instant in his mystical belief
that the war is real, and that it is bound to
end victoriously, with Oceania the undisputed
master of the entire world." — George Orwell,
"1984"
Robert Vaughn Young is a free-lance writer in Newport
Beach, California. |
|